International Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation

Private Sector Rehabilitation

Roger O. Weed, Ph.D.
Georgia State University

Debra E. Berens, M.S., Ph.D.
Georgia State University

Historical Perspective

Historically, private sector rehabilitation typically has referred to services provided by privately owned or proprietary (for-profit) organizations, paid for by private sources such as insurance companies, for purposes of medical case management and vocational rehabilitation, with the goal of providing prompt and cost effective rehabilitation services, reducing medical costs and benefit payments (such as workers' compensation and long term disability), as well as settling personal injury litigation lawsuits (Vencil 1995; Weed and Field 2001). Private sector rehabilitation services began primarily in the United States in an attempt to control the rising costs of workers' compensation claims, which, by 2004, had reached USD$56 BILLION in medical and compensation payments to injured workers (U.S. Census Bureau 2004), and by 2005, more than 19 million Americans were listed as having a work disability (U.S. Census Bureau 2005). As early as 1970, INA Insurance Company employed "rehabilitation nurses" to oversee medical case management, review case records for over-payments to hospitals and doctors, and help facilitate returning workers with injuries to employment by consulting with physicians in order to obtain medical releases based on job duty requirements (Welch 1979).

Later in the 1970s, many insurance companies noted that publicly funded rehabilitation counselors (usually employed by federal/state agencies) were placing industrially injured workers into training programs of two or more year's duration, thereby obligating insurance carriers to continue compensation payments until clients had completed the training programs. In response to the rising costs of medical expenses and payment of lost wages for these clients, a number of insurance carriers began to search for ways to contain costs as well as to exercise more control over the medical and vocational rehabilitation of injured workers (Weed and Field 2001). Following the INA insurance company's lead, other insurance companies hired nurses and rehabilitation counselors. One such company, Crawford and Company claims management, was one of most aggressive in terms of providing private sector rehabilitation and, in 2008, had offices in 63 countries around the world (Crawford and Company 2008).

Seizing the apparent opportunity, entrepreneurial nurses, vocational counselors, and job placement "specialists" approached insurance companies with the promise that their claims costs could be reduced by paying private sector rehabilitation professionals to help manage their cases. Savings were realized by settling cases (closing cases by paying an agreed upon amount of money to the injured worker), or through returning the worker to gainful employment within weeks or months thus often saving thousands of dollars in monthly benefits. As might be expected, many of the beginning private sector rehabilitation consultants were initially employed by insurance companies but soon learned that they could be more financially successful as well as have more flexibility and freedom by entering private practice, often as a sole proprietor or small business owner. It is also noteworthy that many larger businesses foresaw the benefit of employing their own "in-house" private rehabilitation professionals to coordinate the medical and rehabilitative care and return to work of an industrially injured employee.

At the outset, privately held insurance companies could choose to retain private sector professionals – or not – depending on what made the most business sense. However, within a few years, many U.S. state governments passed legislation that mandated medical case management and rehabilitation evaluations (primarily vocational) for industrially injured workers which prompted a nationwide surge in private sector rehabilitation companies (Weed and Field 2001). Over the years, however, most states have reversed the "mandated" rehabilitation services laws (primarily workers' compensation laws) and such services are, at the time of this writing, primarily mandated to be provided to workers whose injuries or impairments meet the particular state's definition of "catastrophically injured."

However, the United States continued to be a leader in private sector rehabilitation and services expanded into other disability related private sector roles (Matkin 1987). Such example services include vocational counseling, job analysis, job placement, job development, case monitoring and follow up, labor market surveys, ergonomic and workplace accessibility consulting, vocational and psychological evaluations, medical case management, expert witness in litigation cases, social security disability insurance vocational expert testimony, job restructuring consultation, job seeking skills training, employee assistance program (EAP) counseling and consultation, counseling of various disorders (personal, injury related adjustment, family and marriage, substance abuse, pain and stress, psychiatric/emotional, etc.), personnel selection consultation, program evaluation, rehabilitation or disability management consultation, labor union negotiations, and medical bill auditing.

Private Sector Rehabilitation Professional Organizations and Related Issues

In the early years of private sector rehabilitation, there were few networking opportunities due to a lack of organizations specific to private sector rehabilitation service delivery. In the late 1970s, the National Association of Rehabilitation Professionals in the Private Sector/NARPPS (now known as the International Association of Rehabilitation Professionals/IARP) was formed and incorporated in 1981. Soon thereafter, state chapters were located throughout the United States, then chapters were expanded into Canada and Ireland (IARP 2008). As the professional field matured, so did IARP by forming special interest sections relating to subspecialties of private sector rehabilitation practice. (Note: There are multiple organizations that have emerged over the years representing specialized segments of practice and a few of these will be listed in the resources section later in this entry. Since IARP is international in focus, as well as multi-disciplinary and non-disability specific, special interest sections are included here as representative of some of the contemporary trends in private sector rehabilitation practice.). The four special interest sections listed below are representative of the majority of active private sector rehabilitation practice in the United States:

  • Case management section representing case managers has been a valued service since the beginning of private sector rehabilitation. Work settings include sole private practice, for-profit case management companies, major business corporations, heath insurance companies, hospitals, attorney offices, and others. Medical case management services generally are provided for people with catastrophic injuries, chronic illness, prenatal risks, complex medical conditions (such as HIV, organ transplants, cancer, and diabetes), as well as elder care for senior adults, social case management, psychological case management, disease management, and patient safety education (Commission on Case Management Certification 2008).
  • Forensic section represents rehabilitation professionals who provide expert witness testimony and consulting with regard to litigation or workers' compensation. Such professionals commonly conduct assessments regarding the effects of injury or disability on a person's ability to work as well as help determine "damages" associated with an incident or injury. Private sector rehabilitation within a forensic setting is complex and requires knowledge of rules specific to the jurisdiction in which the services are being provided. For example, in the United States, there are multiple venues for potential litigation. Each state and the federal government all have different "rules" for how people injured on the job or injured through another person or entity's negligence or fault are to be treated and compensated. Likewise, railroad employees are covered under a separate law (Federal Employees Liability Act/FELA), as do long shore workers or people employed to work on boats in the fishing industry (Jones Act). Similarly, people involved in divorce action, contract law, and multiple other forensic settings have their own set of rules to which the private sector rehabilitation practitioner must adhere (Weed and Field 2001). Personal injury litigation also has different rules for each state except for litigation that qualifies as a Federal case or in instances of personal injury litigation against the military. Further, in each state, there may be differences in automobile related litigation (e.g., "no fault"), medical malpractice or general personal injury litigation laws (Weed 1990). Also included in this area of interest is vocational testimony for U.S. Social Security Disability Insurance claims. Professionals who are active in forensic cases should be well versed in litigation jurisdictions and their requirements as well as expert in disabilities and rehabilitation.
  • Life care planning section is closely related to the forensic section in many instances, and is known as the "International Academy of Life Care Planners." A life care plan is defined as "a dynamic document based upon published standards of practice, comprehensive assessment, data analysis and research, which provides an organized concise plan for current and future needs with associated costs, for individuals who have experienced catastrophic injury or have chronic health care needs" (as cited in Weed 2004 p 3). As one may expect, life care plans can be very important in identifying the needs of a person who has been involved in an injury caused by another party, so many life care planners also consult or testify in litigation (forensic) cases. Life care plans are also useful for identifying a plan of care and setting financial reserves for workers' compensation insurance companies, health insurance companies, elder care facilities, adoption of children with complex health needs, and estate planning for a family member who is severely impaired (injury or illness) and requires a life long projection of needs.
  • Disability management section attracts private sector rehabilitation providers who provide services to facilitate an industrially injured worker's physical recovery, rehabilitation treatment, and return-to-work while, concurrently, controlling the escalating costs of injury and disability for employers, insurance carriers and government (Commission on Disability Management Specialists 2008). The disability manager also is concerned with reducing lost work time by assisting employers with loss prevention education and training as well as safe return to work programs. An employer, rather than an insurance company, often uses the services of a disability manager in which labor and management assume joint responsibility as proactive decision makers, planners, and coordinators for work-based interventions and services. The delivery of disability management services involves a complex interplay among workers with disabilities, employers, insurance carriers, labor unions, medical service providers, government agencies, and disability managers. In general, disability managers must have the education and training to work within the system to accomplish a "win-win" situation for all persons involved (Weed and Hill 2008). An additional topic relevant to private sector rehabilitation is that of certification. Although the details are beyond the scope of this encyclopedia entry, the reader should be aware that professionals in the United Stares, Canada, and to some extent other countries, have access to multiple certifications to assert credentials in their area(s) of specialty practice. In the U.S., national certifications relevant to private sector rehabilitation include rehabilitation counselor, vocational evaluator, legal nurse consultant, life care planner, vocational expert, rehabilitation nurse, and case manager. Some states also require licensure to practice certain professions, such as rehabilitation counseling, professional counseling, nursing, medicine, neuropsychology/psychology, occupational therapy, physical therapy, and speech and language therapy.

Another topic of relevance to private sector rehabilitation is that of ethical service delivery. Over the years, and consistent with other professional human service delivery areas, there have been claims of ethical challenges against individuals providing private sector rehabilitation services (Weed and Field 2001). In response to the growing, changing, and evolving service delivery systems within private sector rehabilitation both in the U.S. and abroad, the IARP standards of practice and code of ethics has been updated and revised to be more applicable to contemporary rehabilitation service delivery (Barros-Bailey, Holloman, Berens, Taylor, and Lockhart 2005). Recognizing that rehabilitation services are provided within a variety of international, federal, local, and state laws or administrative codes, and in a variety of private sector and public sector venues, IARP acknowledges that different methods of service delivery may apply in various countries or jurisdictions as to the practice of medical case management, vocational assessment, rehabilitation plan development, job development and placement, on-the-job training, occupational retraining, and self-employment. To this end, IARP endorses that the methods used by the rehabilitation practitioner should be applicable to the specific area of practice or country/jurisdiction in which the services are being provided (IARP Code of Ethics and Standards of Practice and Competencies 2007). Further, in a study by Weed, Berens, and Pataky (2003), a review of actual claims filed with malpractice insurance companies and/or the Commission for Rehabilitation Counselor Certification (which certifies rehabilitation counselors in Canada and the U.S.) revealed that although private sector rehabilitation professionals were not immune to malpractice claims and ethics complaints, rehabilitation professionals overall had lower claims loss ratios than other professionals in human service occupations. One potential area that may be ethically challenging for the private sector rehabilitation professional who works with insurance companies may be the perception that rehabilitation professionals who receive direct payment are influenced by and/or more responsive to insurance company's requests. This may present professional conduct and ethical challenges which are not typically considered an issue for counterparts who work for public agencies. Even more complicating for the professional is an insurance company which directly employs the person.

International Presence

Internationally, there appear to be limited private sector rehabilitation activities although, as noted above, Canada has a number of rehabilitation counselors, life care planners, medical case managers, and disability case managers working in the private sector. Canada maintains a separate Canadian chapter of IARP and at least two certifying agencies offer a separate certification for Canadian Certified Rehabilitation Counselors and Canadian Certified Life Care Planners. Ireland also has an active IARP chapter and there are a few companies that offer private sector services such as case management and disability management related services (personal communication, B. Webster, May 10, 2008; M. Henderson, May 10, 2008), and employee assistance programs (EAP) (personal communication, M. Darmody, May 12, 2008).

Other countries that offer case management, vocational rehabilitation, and disability management services (and are growing professions) are the United Kingdom, much of Europe, Israel, New Zealand, Australia, most Caribbean Islands, United State Trust territories, as well as some case management in South Africa (Shrey and Grannemann 2004; personal communication, P. Deutsch, May 8, 2008; personal communication, D. Shrey, April 15, 2008; personal communication M. Henderson, May 10, 2008). Also, several Asian countries have indicated an interest in disability management concepts by seeking "Western" experts to present training on the concepts, but, at the time of this writing, most services are still provided by, or paid by the government (personal communication, D. Shrey, April 15, 2008). For a detailed survey of international disability management related occupations and information, the reader is referred to the report issued by Shrey and Grannemann in 2004.

Conclusion

In summary, the United States appears to be the primary provider of the various forms of private sector rehabilitation, although many other countries seem to be a fertile source of business potential, with some entrepreneurs gaining a foothold. Some international companies such as the General Electric Corporation (personal communication, M. Henderson, May 10, 2008) and Crawford and Company claims management services have in-house experts who have introduced private sector rehabilitation concepts to companies in many countries as a potential service for their employees and business associates. Because of the responsiveness and entrepreneurial spirit of private sector professionals, and the proven benefit of providing quality, timely, and cost effective services, it is predicted that, as time progresses, so will private sector rehabilitation into a more global market.

Selected Resources

Disability Management

Certification of Disability Management Specialists
http://www.cdms.org

Disability Management Employer Coalition (International)

http://www.DMEC.org

Case Management

Commission for Case Manager Certification
http://www.ccmcertification.org

International Academy of Life Care Planners

http://www.ialcp.org

International Association of Rehabilitation Professionals

http://www.rehabpro.org

Life Care Planning

International Commission on Health Care Certification (U.S. and Canadian certification)
http://www.ichcc.org

American Association of Nurse Life Care Planners (nurses only)
http://www.aanlcp.org

Rehabilitation Counseling

Commission on Rehabilitation Counselor Certification (U.S. and Canadian certification)
http://www.crccertification.com

American Board of Vocational Experts (U.S. based litigation related certification)
http://www.abve.org

National Rehabilitation Counseling Association (U.S. based)
http://nrca-net.org

Rehabilitation Counciling Association of Australasia (Australian)
http://www.rcaa.org.au

References

Barros-Bailey, M., Holloman, J., Berens, D., Taylor, R., Lockhart, C. 2005.

IARP Code of Ethics, Standards of Practice, and Competencies, 2005 Revision. The Rehabilitation Professional, 13(4), 51-60.

CCMC [Internet] About case management [cited 2008 May 12] available from http://www.ccmcertification.org/download/backgrounder.pdf

CDMS [Internet] Scope of practice (Cited 2008 May 13] available from http://new.cdms.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=15&Itemid=50

Crawford and Company [Internet]. Company Profile. [cited 2008 May 12]. Available from http://www.crawfordandcompany.com/Ghome.aspx

IARP [Internet]. IARP milestones [cited 2008 May 12] Available from http://www.rehabpro.org/about-iarp/milestones

IARP [Internet]. IARP Code of Ethics, Standards of Practice, and Competencies [cited 2008 May 28]. Available from http://www.rehabpro.org/ialcp/about-iarp/standards-and-ethics

Matkin R. 1987. Private sector rehabilitation. In: Rubin S, Roessler R, editors. Foundations of the vocational rehabilitation process, 4th ed. Austin, TX: Pro-ed p 375-439

Shrey D, Grannemann, T. 2004. International Survey of Disability Management Practices. Cincinnati, OH: Advanced Transitions, Inc.

U.S. Census Bureau [Internet] 2004. Table 542. Workers' Compensation Payments: 1990 to 2004. [Cited 2008 May 8]. Available from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/08s0542.pdf

U.S. Census Bureau 2005. Table 541. Persons with work disability by selected characteristics: 2005. [cited 2008 May 12]. Available from http://www.census.gov/compendia/statab/tables/08s0541.pdf

Vencil, MP. 1995. Private sector rehabilitation. In: Dell Orto, A, Marinelli, R, editors. Encyclopedia of disability and rehabilitation. New York, (NY): Macmillan Library Reference USA. p 570-573.

Weed, R. (1990). The role of the rehabilitation expert. In PESI, Georgia proof of personal injury damages, pp II-1 – II-60. Eau Claire, WI: Professional Educational Systems

Weed, R. (1995). Forensic rehabilitation. In A. E. Dell Orto & R. P. Marinelle (eds.) Encyclopedia of disability and rehabilitation, 326-330. New York: Macmillan

Weed, R. 1999/2004. Life care planning: Past, present and future. In: Weed R, editor Life Care Planning and Case Management Handbook, 2nd ed, Winter Park (FL): CRC Press. p 1-13.

Weed, RO, Berens, DE, Pataky, SK. 2003. Malpractice and ethics issues in private sector rehabilitation practice: An update for the 21st century. The Rehabilitation Professional, 11(1), 47-54.

Weed, RO, Field, TF. 2001. The Rehabilitation Consultant's Handbook, 2nd ed. Athens, (GA): Elliott & Fitzpatrick.

Weed, R, Hill, J, 2008. The CRC Guide to success, 9th edition. Athens, (GA): Elliott & Fitzpatrick.

Welch, GT. 1979. The relationship of rehabilitation with industry. Journal of Rehabilitation, 22(1), 30-33.

Further reading

CIRRIE article citations: Private sector rehabilitation

Rehabdata article citations: Private sector rehabilitation

ICF codes: e580 (Health services, systems and policies)

Read this article in other formats and languages

Cite this article

Weed R, Berens D. 2010. Private Sector Rehabilitation. In: JH Stone, M Blouin, editors. International Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation. Available online: http://cirrie.buffalo.edu/encyclopedia/article.php?id=11&language=en

Search

Copyright © 2008-2010 CIRRIE